Review



exeter short revision stem  (Howmedica)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Howmedica exeter short revision stem
    Summary of cement-in-cement studies.
    Exeter Short Revision Stem, supplied by Howmedica, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exeter+short+revision+stem/exeter+stem/pmc06985006-187-91-95
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    exeter short revision stem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips"

    Article Title: Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips

    Journal: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.04.002

    Summary of cement-in-cement studies.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Summary of cement-in-cement studies.

    Techniques Used: Infection, Activity Assay, Migration, Isolation

    Related Articles

    Activity Assay:

    Article Title: Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips
    Article Snippet: Standard Exeter stems [5] CDH Exeter stems [7] Long stainless steel Exeter stem [1] (Stryker Ltd, Newbury, United Kingdom) CPT stainless steel hemi stem [1] Standard stainless steel CPT stems [3] Petite stainless steel CPT stems [2] Standard cobalt-chrome CPT stems [4] (Zimmer, Warsaw, Ind) Survivorship Rate Not reported Revisions 1 (4.3%) Periprosthetic fracture 1 (4.3%) Acetabular component loosening (stem not revised) Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Median HHS 61 Other Complications 1 (4.3%) Periprosthetic fracture 1 (4.3%) Acetabular component loosening (stem not revised) Goto et al. 2008 6 44 61 (24–121) THR acetabular loosening (91%) Bipolar hemi head penetration (9%) HS (physio-hip-system) type 6 [30] KC [7] PHS type 7 [3] HS-3 [4] All titanium alloy (Japan Medical Materials, Osaka, Japan) Survivorship Rate 71.5% five years, 53.5% ten years using appearance of 1 mm width radiolucent line in any zone as endpoint Revisions 1 (2.3%) femoral loosening/periprosthetic fracture Aseptic Loosening Femur 1 (2.3%) Outcome Scores Mean JOA 77.8 Complications Peri-operative fracture: 10 (22.7%); (9 greater trochanter, 1 proximal perforation) Dislocation: 3 (6.8%) Heterotopic ossification: 1 (2.3%) Briant-Evans et al. 2009 22 23 36 (3.6–108) Periprosthetic fracture Exeter polished tapered stem (Stryker Ltd, Newbury, United Kingdom) Survivorship Rate Not reported Revisions 1 (4.3%) Non-union resulting in periprosthetic fracture Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Not reported Other Complications 1 (4.3%) non-union Duncan et al. 2009 16 136 96 (40–180) Acetabular component failure/loosening (75%) Recurrent dis- location/Subluxation (15%) Sepsis (6%) Access for removal of ectopic bone in (2%) Periprosthetic fracture in (2%) Exeter polished stems (Stryker Howmedica, Newbury, United Kingdom) [133] Charnley (DePuy, Leeds, United Kingdom) [1] McKee- Arden (Deloro Surgical, Swindon, United Kingdom) [1] Muller (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) [1] Survivorship Rate Survival rate for revision for all causes at nine years was 92.0% Revisions 35 hips (25.7%): Failure of the acetabular component 26 (19.1%), sepsis in 4 (2.9%), instability in 3 (2.2%), femoral fracture in 1 (0.7%) and stem fracture in 1 (0.7%). .. Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Median HHS: Pain 40.0, Function 28.0, Median OHS 33.5 Median Charnley: Pain 6.0, Function 3.0, Range Of Movement 5.0 Other Complications 2 (1.5%) Femoral perforation 1 (0.7%) Stem fracture (Charnley stem) 4 (2.9%) Deep infections (2 two stage revisions, 1 girdlestone) 3 (2.2%) Dislocations 1 (0.7%) Periprosthetic femoral fracture te Stroet et al. 2014 8 24 72 (60–84) Aseptic loosening (45.8%) Early proximal loosening observed during acetabular revision (20.8%) Recurrent dislocation (12.5%) Femoral stem fracture (8.3%) Version/offset alteration (8.3%) Monobloc with damaged head exchange (4.2%) Exeter Short Revision Stem, (Stryker-Howmedica, Newbury, United Kingdom) Survivorship 82% Revisions 4 (17%) for septic loosening Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Mean HHS 85 Mean OHS 19 Mean VAS pain at rest 8 Mean VAS pain during physical activity 10 Mean VAS satisfaction 87 Other Complications 1 (4.2%) intra-operative femoral perforation Mounsey et al. 2015 23 28 70 (25–124) All Hemis Acetabular erosion (57%) Recurrent dislocation (29%) Periprosthetic fracture (7%) De-bonding of cement stem interface proximally (3.5%) Infection (3.5%) Standard length 155 mm Exeter stem [3] Shorter 125 mm 35.5 mm offset stem in [9] Short125 mm 44 mm off-set revision stem [6] (Stryker Ltd, Newbury, United Kingdom) Survivorship rate Not reported Revisions 2 (7.1%) periprosthetic fracture 1 (3.6%) deep infection 1 (3.6%) recurrent dislocation (acetabular component only) Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Mean OHS 32.0 Mean HHS pain 33.1; HHS function 20.4 Other Complications 1 (3.6%) perforation proximal to the lesser trochanter. ..

    Article Title: Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips
    Article Snippet: Duncan et al. 2009 16 , 136 , 96 (40–180) , Acetabular component failure/loosening (75%) Recurrent dis- location/Subluxation (15%) Sepsis (6%) Access for removal of ectopic bone in (2%) Periprosthetic fracture in (2%) , Exeter polished stems (Stryker Howmedica, Newbury, United Kingdom) [133] Charnley (DePuy, Leeds, United Kingdom) [1] McKee- Arden (Deloro Surgical, Swindon, United Kingdom) [1] Muller (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) [1] , Survivorship Rate Survival rate for revision for all causes at nine years was 92.0% Revisions 35 hips (25.7%): Failure of the acetabular component 26 (19.1%), sepsis in 4 (2.9%), instability in 3 (2.2%), femoral fracture in 1 (0.7%) and stem fracture in 1 (0.7%). Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Median HHS: Pain 40.0, Function 28.0, Median OHS 33.5 Median Charnley: Pain 6.0, Function 3.0, Range Of Movement 5.0 Other Complications 2 (1.5%) Femoral perforation 1 (0.7%) Stem fracture (Charnley stem) 4 (2.9%) Deep infections (2 two stage revisions, 1 girdlestone) 3 (2.2%) Dislocations 1 (0.7%) Periprosthetic femoral fracture. .. te Stroet et al. 2014 8 , 24 , 72 (60–84) , Aseptic loosening (45.8%) Early proximal loosening observed during acetabular revision (20.8%) Recurrent dislocation (12.5%) Femoral stem fracture (8.3%) Version/offset alteration (8.3%) Monobloc with damaged head exchange (4.2%) , Exeter Short Revision Stem, (Stryker-Howmedica, Newbury, United Kingdom) , Survivorship 82% Revisions 4 (17%) for septic loosening Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Mean HHS 85 Mean OHS 19 Mean VAS pain at rest 8 Mean VAS pain during physical activity 10 Mean VAS satisfaction 87 Other Complications 1 (4.2%) intra-operative femoral perforation. .. Mounsey et al. 2015 23 , 28 , 70 (25–124) , All Hemis Acetabular erosion (57%) Recurrent dislocation (29%) Periprosthetic fracture (7%) De-bonding of cement stem interface proximally (3.5%) Infection (3.5%) , Standard length 155 mm Exeter stem [3] Shorter 125 mm 35.5 mm offset stem in [9] Short125 mm 44 mm off-set revision stem [6] (Stryker Ltd, Newbury, United Kingdom) , Survivorship rate Not reported Revisions 2 (7.1%) periprosthetic fracture 1 (3.6%) deep infection 1 (3.6%) recurrent dislocation (acetabular component only) Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Mean OHS 32.0 Mean HHS pain 33.1; HHS function 20.4 Other Complications 1 (3.6%) perforation proximal to the lesser trochanter. 1 (3.6%) calcar crack 1 (3.6%) acetabular fracture 1 (3.6%) early dislocations managed by closed reduction.

    Infection:

    Article Title: Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips
    Article Snippet: Standard Exeter stems [5] CDH Exeter stems [7] Long stainless steel Exeter stem [1] (Stryker Ltd, Newbury, United Kingdom) CPT stainless steel hemi stem [1] Standard stainless steel CPT stems [3] Petite stainless steel CPT stems [2] Standard cobalt-chrome CPT stems [4] (Zimmer, Warsaw, Ind) Survivorship Rate Not reported Revisions 1 (4.3%) Periprosthetic fracture 1 (4.3%) Acetabular component loosening (stem not revised) Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Median HHS 61 Other Complications 1 (4.3%) Periprosthetic fracture 1 (4.3%) Acetabular component loosening (stem not revised) Goto et al. 2008 6 44 61 (24–121) THR acetabular loosening (91%) Bipolar hemi head penetration (9%) HS (physio-hip-system) type 6 [30] KC [7] PHS type 7 [3] HS-3 [4] All titanium alloy (Japan Medical Materials, Osaka, Japan) Survivorship Rate 71.5% five years, 53.5% ten years using appearance of 1 mm width radiolucent line in any zone as endpoint Revisions 1 (2.3%) femoral loosening/periprosthetic fracture Aseptic Loosening Femur 1 (2.3%) Outcome Scores Mean JOA 77.8 Complications Peri-operative fracture: 10 (22.7%); (9 greater trochanter, 1 proximal perforation) Dislocation: 3 (6.8%) Heterotopic ossification: 1 (2.3%) Briant-Evans et al. 2009 22 23 36 (3.6–108) Periprosthetic fracture Exeter polished tapered stem (Stryker Ltd, Newbury, United Kingdom) Survivorship Rate Not reported Revisions 1 (4.3%) Non-union resulting in periprosthetic fracture Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Not reported Other Complications 1 (4.3%) non-union Duncan et al. 2009 16 136 96 (40–180) Acetabular component failure/loosening (75%) Recurrent dis- location/Subluxation (15%) Sepsis (6%) Access for removal of ectopic bone in (2%) Periprosthetic fracture in (2%) Exeter polished stems (Stryker Howmedica, Newbury, United Kingdom) [133] Charnley (DePuy, Leeds, United Kingdom) [1] McKee- Arden (Deloro Surgical, Swindon, United Kingdom) [1] Muller (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) [1] Survivorship Rate Survival rate for revision for all causes at nine years was 92.0% Revisions 35 hips (25.7%): Failure of the acetabular component 26 (19.1%), sepsis in 4 (2.9%), instability in 3 (2.2%), femoral fracture in 1 (0.7%) and stem fracture in 1 (0.7%). .. Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Median HHS: Pain 40.0, Function 28.0, Median OHS 33.5 Median Charnley: Pain 6.0, Function 3.0, Range Of Movement 5.0 Other Complications 2 (1.5%) Femoral perforation 1 (0.7%) Stem fracture (Charnley stem) 4 (2.9%) Deep infections (2 two stage revisions, 1 girdlestone) 3 (2.2%) Dislocations 1 (0.7%) Periprosthetic femoral fracture te Stroet et al. 2014 8 24 72 (60–84) Aseptic loosening (45.8%) Early proximal loosening observed during acetabular revision (20.8%) Recurrent dislocation (12.5%) Femoral stem fracture (8.3%) Version/offset alteration (8.3%) Monobloc with damaged head exchange (4.2%) Exeter Short Revision Stem, (Stryker-Howmedica, Newbury, United Kingdom) Survivorship 82% Revisions 4 (17%) for septic loosening Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Mean HHS 85 Mean OHS 19 Mean VAS pain at rest 8 Mean VAS pain during physical activity 10 Mean VAS satisfaction 87 Other Complications 1 (4.2%) intra-operative femoral perforation Mounsey et al. 2015 23 28 70 (25–124) All Hemis Acetabular erosion (57%) Recurrent dislocation (29%) Periprosthetic fracture (7%) De-bonding of cement stem interface proximally (3.5%) Infection (3.5%) Standard length 155 mm Exeter stem [3] Shorter 125 mm 35.5 mm offset stem in [9] Short125 mm 44 mm off-set revision stem [6] (Stryker Ltd, Newbury, United Kingdom) Survivorship rate Not reported Revisions 2 (7.1%) periprosthetic fracture 1 (3.6%) deep infection 1 (3.6%) recurrent dislocation (acetabular component only) Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Mean OHS 32.0 Mean HHS pain 33.1; HHS function 20.4 Other Complications 1 (3.6%) perforation proximal to the lesser trochanter. ..



    Similar Products

    exeter v40 short revision stem  (Arthro Kinetics)
    90
    Arthro Kinetics exeter v40 short revision stem
    Exeter V40 Short Revision Stem, supplied by Arthro Kinetics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exeter+short+revision+stem/exeter+v40+short+revision+stem/pm37660075-239-25-37
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    exeter v40 short revision stem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    exeter short revision stem  (Stryker)
    90
    Stryker exeter short revision stem
    Exeter Short Revision Stem, supplied by Stryker, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exeter+short+revision+stem/exeter+stem/pmc09764178-19-15-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    exeter short revision stem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    exeter short revision stem  (Howmedica)
    90
    Howmedica exeter short revision stem
    Summary of cement-in-cement studies.
    Exeter Short Revision Stem, supplied by Howmedica, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exeter+short+revision+stem/exeter+stem/pmc06985006-187-91-95
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    exeter short revision stem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    exeter offset short revision stem (srs)  (Stryker)
    90
    Stryker exeter offset short revision stem (srs)
    Summary of cement-in-cement studies.
    Exeter Offset Short Revision Stem (Srs), supplied by Stryker, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exeter+short+revision+stem/exeter+stem/pmc06985006-61-8-12
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    exeter offset short revision stem (srs) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    exeter short revision stem (srs)  (Howmedica)
    90
    Howmedica exeter short revision stem (srs)
    Summary of cement-in-cement studies.
    Exeter Short Revision Stem (Srs), supplied by Howmedica, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/exeter+short+revision+stem/exeter+stem/pm24970322-42-50-55
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    exeter short revision stem (srs) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Summary of cement-in-cement studies.

    Journal: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma

    Article Title: Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.04.002

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of cement-in-cement studies.

    Article Snippet: Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Median HHS: Pain 40.0, Function 28.0, Median OHS 33.5 Median Charnley: Pain 6.0, Function 3.0, Range Of Movement 5.0 Other Complications 2 (1.5%) Femoral perforation 1 (0.7%) Stem fracture (Charnley stem) 4 (2.9%) Deep infections (2 two stage revisions, 1 girdlestone) 3 (2.2%) Dislocations 1 (0.7%) Periprosthetic femoral fracture te Stroet et al. 2014 8 24 72 (60–84) Aseptic loosening (45.8%) Early proximal loosening observed during acetabular revision (20.8%) Recurrent dislocation (12.5%) Femoral stem fracture (8.3%) Version/offset alteration (8.3%) Monobloc with damaged head exchange (4.2%) Exeter Short Revision Stem, (Stryker-Howmedica, Newbury, United Kingdom) Survivorship 82% Revisions 4 (17%) for septic loosening Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Mean HHS 85 Mean OHS 19 Mean VAS pain at rest 8 Mean VAS pain during physical activity 10 Mean VAS satisfaction 87 Other Complications 1 (4.2%) intra-operative femoral perforation Mounsey et al. 2015 23 28 70 (25–124) All Hemis Acetabular erosion (57%) Recurrent dislocation (29%) Periprosthetic fracture (7%) De-bonding of cement stem interface proximally (3.5%) Infection (3.5%) Standard length 155 mm Exeter stem [3] Shorter 125 mm 35.5 mm offset stem in [9] Short125 mm 44 mm off-set revision stem [6] (Stryker Ltd, Newbury, United Kingdom) Survivorship rate Not reported Revisions 2 (7.1%) periprosthetic fracture 1 (3.6%) deep infection 1 (3.6%) recurrent dislocation (acetabular component only) Aseptic Loosening Femur None Outcome Scores Mean OHS 32.0 Mean HHS pain 33.1; HHS function 20.4 Other Complications 1 (3.6%) perforation proximal to the lesser trochanter.

    Techniques: Infection, Activity Assay, Migration, Isolation